CT research findings – Massachusetts General Hospital
Published on February 7, 2013.


A long-term analysis of nearly 22,000 young adults undergoing CT scans shows that they are at far greater risk of dying from underlying disease than from radiation-induced cancer, according to a study in Radiology.
Researchers from Massachusetts General Hospital found that among patients getting chest CT scans, 7.1% died during the study’s 5.5-year follow-up period; during their lifetimes, this same population would see 0.1% of total deaths from radiation-induced cancer from CT scanning. The results were less dramatic for abdominal CT patients, with 3.9% of the patients dying during the follow-up period, with CT again contributing 0.1% to the total lifetime death rate (Radiology, February 5, 2013).

The results place the risk-benefit analysis of CT scans into a more clinically relevant context than past studies, lead author Susanna Lee and colleagues wrote. Most models that estimate CT radiation-induced cancer assume that the patient is in perfect health and will remain alive for decades required for the predicted radiation-induced latency period. These assumptions will need to be reconsidered, they wrote.
Moreover, CT risks are lower now that typical doses have been reduced to one-third to one-half of those used during the study period.

If you need a CT scan the risks of the underlying disease dwarf any potential radiation risks, and patients should not refuse medical imaging on the basis of radiation fears.

Connect with SJRA

SJRABlog Facebook Twitter SJRA on YouTube RSS

“Anytime I have gone to the Voorhees office I have been treated so nice. Everyone I talked to was very polite and friendly. I will always go there anytime I need too because of how well you are treated. Thank you for the great service.” Voorhees Office Patient

© SJRA Copyright 2015. All rights reserved.